4 Cleary,Robert E.Dialogue,Negotiation and the Advancement of Democracy:Reflections on Minnowbrook Ⅱ.Public Administration Review.March/April 1989,v.49:226—7.
5 Frederickson,H.George.Minnowbrook Ⅱ:Changing Epochs of PublicAdministration.Public Administrative Review,vol.49.March/April 1989,p.95—100.
6 Frederickson,H.George.Toward a New Public Administration(1971).Classics of Public Administration.Hartcourt Brace College Publishers.Fort Worth:Texas.1997.
7 Friedman,Robert S.Representation in Regulatory Decision Making:Scientific,Industrial,and Customer Inputs to the FDA.Public Administration Review.May/June 1978,p.205—213.
8 Gormley,william,Hoadley,John 8t williams,Charles.Potential Responsiveness in the Bureaucracy:Views of Public Utility Regulation.American Political Science Review,vol.77,1983,p.703—716.
9 Guy,Mary E.Minnowbrook Ⅱ:Conclusions.Public Administrative Review,vol.49.March/April 1989,p.219—20.
10 Hart,David K.A Partnership in Virtue Among All Citizens:The Public Service and Civic Humanism.Public Administrative Review,vol.49.March/April 1989,p.101—105.
11 Holzer,Marc.Minnowbrook Ⅱ:Conclusions.Public Administrative Review,vol.49.March/April 1989,p.221—1.
12 Kaufman,Herbert.Administrative Decentralization and Political Power(1969).Classics of Public Administration.Hartcourt Brace College Publishers.Fort Worth:Texas.1997.